The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

The law of promissory notes, bills of exchange and cheques — who can be paid on them, how they change hands, and what happens when they are dishonoured.

Quick answer

The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is the law of promissory notes, bills of exchange and cheques. It decides what counts as each, who is entitled to be paid on one, how it passes from hand to hand, when it must be presented, what happens when it is dishonoured, and what a crossing on a cheque means. It was not replaced or renumbered in 2024. Its best-known part, the cheque-bounce offence in section 138, is a separate chapter with its own page.

Key takeaways

  • Three instruments only: a promissory note is a promise to pay (s. 4), a bill of exchange is an order to pay (s. 5), and a cheque is a bill drawn on a banker payable on demand — including a truncated cheque’s electronic image and a cheque in electronic form (s. 6).
  • A "holder in due course" — someone who took the instrument for consideration, before it fell due, without cause to suspect a defect in title — takes it free of many defences that would defeat an ordinary holder (ss. 9, 58, 120).
  • Every negotiable instrument is presumed, until the contrary is proved, to have been made for consideration and on the date it bears, and its holder is presumed to be a holder in due course (s. 118).
  • Where an instrument names no interest rate, the Act fixes 18% a year from the date it ought to have been paid, notwithstanding any agreement between the parties about interest (s. 80).
  • A cheque crossed generally can only be paid to a banker; one marked "not negotiable" cannot pass a better title than its transferor had (ss. 126, 130). The words "account payee" appear nowhere in the Act.
The three negotiable instruments, compared
Promissory note, bill of exchange and cheque compared
FeaturePromissory noteBill of exchangeCheque
Defined ins. 4s. 5s. 6
What it isA promise — "I promise to pay"An order — "Pay to"An order to a specified banker
PartiesTwo: maker and payeeThree: drawer, drawee and payeeThree: drawer, bank and payee
AcceptanceNo acceptance neededDrawee is liable only once they acceptNo acceptance
When payableOn demand, or at a fixed or determinable future timeOn demand, or at a fixed or determinable future timeAlways on demand (s. 19)

From sections 4, 5, 6, 19 and 32 of the Act. A cheque includes the electronic image of a truncated cheque and a cheque in electronic form (s. 6, substituted by Act 55 of 2002 with effect from 6 February 2003).

After a cheque bounces: two separate routes under the same Act
This page
Civil claim on the instrument
  1. Dishonour by non-payment (s. 92)
  2. Notice of dishonour to parties to be held liable (ss. 93–98)
  3. Suit for the amount, expenses and interest (ss. 80, 117)
Chapter XVII
Criminal complaint for a bounced cheque
  1. Cheque returned for insufficient funds (s. 138)
  2. Written demand notice under s. 138(b)
  3. Complaint to a Magistrate (s. 142)
Read the section 138 page

The two can run side by side; one does not replace the other, and the notices they need are different. Deadlines for the criminal route are strict and are set out on the section 138 page.

What the Negotiable Instruments Act covers

The Negotiable Instruments Act is Act 26 of 1881, in force since 1 March 1882 and extending to the whole of India. It does not affect local usages for instruments in an oriental language, such as hundis, unless the instrument itself says the Act is to govern it (s. 1).

Section 13 defines a negotiable instrument as a promissory note, bill of exchange or cheque payable either to order or to bearer. An instrument is payable to order when it is expressed to be payable to a particular person and does not contain words prohibiting transfer; it is payable to bearer when it says so, or when its only or last indorsement is in blank.

This is one of the older Acts in this cluster, and the 2024 criminal law reform left it alone: its sections kept their numbers. Where it still refers to the Code of Criminal Procedure — in Chapter XVII — section 8 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 reads that reference as one to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, unless a different intention appears.

What is — and is not — a promissory note, from the illustrations to section 4
The words on the paperA promissory note?Why
"I promise to pay B or order Rs. 500."YesAn unconditional undertaking to pay a certain sum to a certain person
"I acknowledge myself to be indebted to B in Rs. 1,000, to be paid on demand, for value received."YesAn undertaking to pay, on demand
"Mr. B, I O U Rs. 1,000."NoAn acknowledgement of a debt, with no undertaking to pay
"I promise to pay B Rs. 500 and all other sums which shall be due to him."NoThe sum is not certain
"I promise to pay B Rs. 500 seven days after my marriage with C."NoConditional on an event that may never happen
"I promise to pay B Rs. 500 and to deliver to him my black horse on 1st January next."NoNot an undertaking to pay money only

The Act’s own illustrations. An IOU that is not a promissory note can still be evidence of a debt; it is simply not an instrument the Act governs.

Holder and holder in due course

A "holder" is the person entitled in their own name to possess the instrument and to receive or recover the amount due on it (s. 8). A "holder in due course" is a narrower thing: a person who, for consideration, became the possessor of a bearer instrument or the payee or indorsee of an order instrument, before the amount became payable, and without sufficient cause to believe there was any defect in the title of the person they took it from (s. 9).

The distinction matters because of what a holder in due course is protected against. If an instrument was lost, or obtained by an offence or fraud, or for an unlawful consideration, no one claiming through the finder or wrongdoer can recover on it — unless they, or someone through whom they claim, was a holder in due course (s. 58). Between the immediate parties, an instrument given without consideration creates no obligation to pay; but a holder for consideration who takes from one of them can recover (s. 43).

Two estoppels add to that protection: the maker of a note or drawer of a cheque cannot deny the instrument’s original validity against a holder in due course (s. 120), and no indorser can deny the signature or capacity of a prior party in a suit by a later holder (s. 122).

The presumptions in section 118, which apply until the contrary is proved
ClauseWhat is presumed
(a) ConsiderationThe instrument was made, and each acceptance, indorsement or transfer was made, for consideration
(b) DateAn instrument bearing a date was made on that date
(c) Time of acceptanceAn accepted bill was accepted within a reasonable time after its date and before maturity
(d) Time of transferEvery transfer was made before maturity
(e) Order of indorsementsIndorsements were made in the order in which they appear
(f) StampA lost note, bill or cheque was duly stamped
(g) Holder in due courseThe holder is a holder in due course — but if the instrument was obtained by an offence or fraud, or for unlawful consideration, the holder must prove it

Section 139, in Chapter XVII, adds a further presumption for prosecutions under section 138. It belongs with section 138 and is not explained on this page.

How an instrument is negotiated and indorsed

An instrument is negotiated when it is transferred so as to make the transferee its holder (s. 14). How that is done depends on how it is payable. A bearer instrument passes by delivery alone (s. 47); an order instrument passes by indorsement and delivery (s. 48). Making, accepting or indorsing is only complete on delivery, actual or constructive (s. 46).

An indorsement is the signature of the maker or holder, for the purpose of negotiation, on the back or face of the instrument or on a slip attached to it (s. 15). An indorser who delivers before maturity, without excluding their own liability, must compensate every later holder if the instrument is dishonoured — provided due notice of dishonour reaches them (s. 35).

Two limits catch people out. An indorsement cannot transfer only part of the amount due, though a part payment can be noted and the balance negotiated (s. 56). And a person who signs a stamped paper, blank or incomplete, and hands it over gives the holder authority to complete it for any amount up to what the stamp covers — liable in full to a holder in due course, though no one else can recover more than was intended (s. 20).

Kinds of indorsement
IndorsementWhat it looks likeEffect
In blank (s. 16)The indorser’s signature onlyThe instrument becomes payable to bearer and passes by delivery (s. 13, Expl. (ii))
In full (s. 16)A signature with a direction to pay a named person or their orderThe named indorsee must indorse in turn to negotiate it
Excluding liability (s. 52)For example, "without recourse"The indorser incurs no liability on it
Conditional (s. 52)Liability or payment made to depend on a specified eventBinding only if the event happens
Part of the sum (s. 56)Transfers a portion of the amountNot valid for negotiation

Presentment, maturity and interest

Notes, bills and cheques must be presented for payment to the maker, acceptor or drawee; if they are not, the other parties are not liable to the holder (s. 64). A cheque must be presented at the bank it is drawn on before the drawer’s position with that bank changes to the drawer’s prejudice (s. 72). If a cheque is not presented within a reasonable time and the drawer suffers actual damage from the delay — because the bank fails in the meantime, say — the drawer is discharged to the extent of that damage (s. 84). A bank holding enough of the drawer’s funds must pay a duly presented cheque, and must compensate the drawer if it does not (s. 31).

A note or bill with no time for payment, and every cheque, is payable on demand (s. 19). A note or bill payable at a future date carries three days of grace: it falls due on the third day after the day it is expressed to be payable (s. 22). If that day is a public holiday, including a Sunday, it falls due on the preceding business day (s. 25). Where the amount in words differs from the amount in figures, the words prevail (s. 18).

Interest follows the instrument. If a rate is specified, it runs at that rate from the instrument’s date (s. 79). If no rate is specified, section 80 fixes 18% a year from the date the amount ought to have been paid, notwithstanding any agreement about interest between the parties; an indorser pays interest only from when they receive notice of dishonour. The 18% figure was substituted by Act 66 of 1988 with effect from 30 December 1988.

Dishonour, notice of dishonour, noting and protest

An instrument is dishonoured by non-payment when the maker, acceptor or drawee defaults on being duly required to pay (s. 92); a bill is dishonoured by non-acceptance when the drawee defaults in accepting it (s. 91). The holder must then give notice of dishonour to every other party they want to hold liable (s. 93). The notice may be oral or written, in any form, but must tell the party that the instrument has been dishonoured, how, and that they will be held liable (s. 94). No notice is needed to charge the maker of a note or the drawee or acceptor of a bill or cheque (s. 93), or in the cases listed in section 98 — for example, where the drawer has countermanded payment.

A promissory note or bill may also be noted by a notary public — a record of the date and reason for dishonour — and a notary’s certificate of dishonour is a protest (ss. 99, 100). In a suit on a dishonoured instrument, proof of protest raises a presumption that it was dishonoured (s. 119). A holder who recovers is entitled to the amount due plus the expenses of presenting, noting and protesting (s. 117).

⚠️
This is not the section 138 notice

The notice of dishonour in sections 93 to 98 is what keeps other parties liable in a civil claim. The written demand that must precede a criminal complaint for a bounced cheque is a different notice, under section 138(b), with its own deadline. Sending one does not satisfy the other.

Crossed cheques: general, special and "not negotiable"

A cheque is crossed generally when two parallel transverse lines are drawn across its face, with or without the words "and company" or "not negotiable" (s. 123). It is crossed specially when a banker’s name is added across its face (s. 124). A holder may cross an uncrossed cheque, turn a general crossing into a special one, and add "not negotiable" to either (s. 125).

The crossing directs the paying bank. A cheque crossed generally may be paid only to a banker; one crossed specially only to the banker named or its collecting agent (s. 126). A bank that pays otherwise is liable to the true owner for any loss (s. 129). A collecting bank that receives payment in good faith and without negligence for its customer is protected if the customer’s title proves defective (s. 131). The Chapter applies to bank drafts as if they were cheques (s. 131A).

What each crossing does
On the chequeKindWho the drawee bank may pay
Two parallel lines, with or without "& Co."General (s. 123)Only a banker (s. 126)
A banker’s name across the faceSpecial (s. 124)Only that banker, or its agent for collection (s. 126)
Crossed specially to more than one banker, other than to an agent for collectionSpecial (s. 127)No one — payment must be refused
Either crossing plus "not negotiable"General or special (s. 130)As above — and no transferee gets a better title than the person they took it from

"Account payee" is not a crossing defined in the Act; the phrase does not appear in its text.

More questions about this page

What is the difference between a promissory note, a bill of exchange and a cheque?
A promissory note is the maker’s own unconditional promise to pay (s. 4). A bill of exchange is an unconditional order to someone else to pay (s. 5). A cheque is a bill of exchange drawn on a specified banker and payable on demand, and now includes a truncated cheque’s electronic image and a cheque in electronic form (s. 6).
Who is a holder in due course under the NI Act?
Under section 9, a person who became the possessor of a bearer instrument, or the payee or indorsee of an order instrument, for consideration, before the amount became payable, and without sufficient cause to believe there was a defect in the title of the person they took it from. Such a holder is protected against several defences, including fraud in how an earlier party obtained it (s. 58).
Is an IOU a promissory note?
Not under the Act. Illustration (c) to section 4 gives "Mr. B, I O U Rs. 1,000" as an example of an instrument that is not a promissory note, because it acknowledges a debt without an undertaking to pay. An IOU can still be evidence that money is owed; it is simply not a negotiable instrument.
What interest applies on a promissory note with no rate mentioned?
Section 80 fixes 18% a year, calculated from the date the amount ought to have been paid until it is tendered or realised, or until a date after the suit that the court directs. It applies notwithstanding any agreement between the parties relating to interest. An indorser is liable for interest only from the date they receive notice of dishonour.
What does "not negotiable" written on a crossed cheque mean?
Under section 130, a person who takes a crossed cheque marked "not negotiable" does not get, and cannot give, a better title than the person they took it from had. The cheque can still be transferred; what it loses is the protection a holder in due course would otherwise enjoy against a defect in an earlier title.
Is a bounced cheque covered by the NI Act?
Yes, in two separate ways. Chapter XVII, from section 138, makes dishonour for insufficient funds an offence, with strict notice and complaint deadlines — covered on GetNyay’s cheque-bounce page. Separately, the dishonoured cheque remains an instrument the holder can sue on in a civil court under the Act’s general rules on dishonour and compensation.
Was the Negotiable Instruments Act changed by the new criminal laws?
No. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and Sakshya Adhiniyam replaced the Penal Code, CrPC and Evidence Act, but the NI Act was not amended or renumbered. Where Chapter XVII refers to the Code of Criminal Procedure, section 8 of the General Clauses Act reads it as a reference to the corresponding BNSS provision.

Official sources checked

The statutes, rules and regulator pages the statements on this page were checked against.

What a crossing looks like, and what it does
  • Uncrosseds. 125

    No crossing, so no crossing restriction

  • Crossed generallys. 123

    Paid only to a banker

  • Crossed speciallys. 124

    Paid only to the named banker

  • Not negotiables. 130

    No better title than the transferor’s

Illustrations only. The Act defines general and special crossings and the words “not negotiable”; the bank named is an example. A holder may add a crossing to an uncrossed cheque (s. 125).

The sections of the NI Act people look up

Key provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
SectionWhat it does
s. 4"Promissory note"Defines a promissory note.
s. 5"Bill of exchange"Defines a bill of exchange.
s. 6"Cheque"Defines a cheque, including electronic and truncated cheques.
s. 9"Holder in due course"Who is a holder in due course.
s. 13"Negotiable instrument"What makes an instrument negotiable.
s. 20Inchoate stamped instrumentsLiability on a signed, stamped but incomplete instrument.
s. 31Liability of drawee of chequeA bank’s duty to pay a cheque when funds are available.
s. 58Instrument obtained by unlawful means or for unlawful considerationNo title through a finder or a fraud, except via a holder in due course.
s. 80Interest when no rate specifiedInterest at 18% where no rate is specified.
s. 84When cheque not duly presented and drawer damaged therebyWhen delay in presenting a cheque discharges the drawer.
s. 93By and to whom notice should be givenWho must give notice of dishonour, and to whom.
s. 100ProtestProtest by a notary public.
s. 118Presumptions as to negotiable instrumentsThe presumptions about every negotiable instrument.
s. 126Payment of cheque crossed generallyWho a crossed cheque may be paid to.
s. 130Cheque bearing "not negotiable"The effect of "not negotiable".
s. 131Non-liability of banker receiving payment of chequeProtection for a collecting bank acting in good faith.
ss. 138–148Dishonour of cheques for insufficiency of fundsChapter XVII, sections 138 to 148: dishonour of a cheque for insufficient funds as an offence.Cheque bounce: notice, deadlines and the case

The Act was not renumbered in 2024. Chapter XVII is covered in full on a separate page.

Not legal advice. This page explains what a provision says and how the procedure around it works, checked against the Act as in force on the date shown. It is not advice about a charge, a complaint or an arrest, and it cannot be: whether a provision fits a set of facts is the question a court decides, and the facts a page cannot see are usually the ones that matter. If you are facing a criminal matter, or deciding whether to start one, speak to an advocate.

No legal reviewer, deliberately. GetNyay is not a law firm and does not practise law. Nothing on this page is legal advice or a substitute for advice from an advocate on your own facts. Our tax and consumer pages carry a Chartered Accountant’s review credit; that credential does not extend to criminal law, so these pages carry none. We would rather show you the sources than a review that has not happened — every section number and classification here is cited to the Act or the Schedule it came from, with the date checked.

Last reviewed September 2026.

Ask GetNyay AI