GetNyay Data · India crime data tracker

The conviction rate is 53.3%. It describes 8.6% of the cases.

The National Crime Records Bureau publishes a conviction rate and a chargesheeting rate, and both are quoted as though they described what happens to a reported crime. Neither does. This page says what each rate is a rate of, and carries every NCRB crime head across to the section of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita that replaced it.

Updated 26 September 2026Next update when NCRB publishes Crime in India 2025Sources 5 documentsLicence CC BY 4.0 — reuse with credit

How much crime does India record, and how much of it ends in a conviction?

NCRB recorded 58,85,867 cognizable crimes in 2024, of which 35,44,608 were offences under the Penal Code or the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.[3] The police chargesheeted 72.1% of the cases they finished with, and the courts convicted in 53.3% of the trials they completed.[2] Neither figure is the chance that a reported crime ends in a conviction: measured against every case that was before a criminal court during the year, convictions were 4.6%.GetNyay calculation

Key takeaways

  • NCRB recorded 35,44,608 cognizable IPC and BNS offences in 2024, and 58,85,867 including Special and Local Laws.
  • The chargesheeting rate of 72.1% is chargesheets over the cases the police finished with — not over cases registered. The conviction rate of 53.3% is convictions over trials completed, not over cases registered. Neither is the chance that a reported crime ends in a conviction.
  • Of the 1.84 crore cases before the criminal courts during 2024, 8.6% reached the end of a trial and 4.6% ended in a conviction. 86% of that caseload was inherited from earlier years.
  • NCRB reported a 6.0% fall in registered crime. It also stopped counting three crime heads worth about 4.64 lakh cases when last counted, because the BNS made them non-cognizable.
Cognizable crimes, 2024
58,85,867
Including 23,41,259 under Special and Local Laws. A rate of 418.9 per lakh.
Chargesheeting rate
72.1%
Of the 35,21,488 cases the police disposed of — not of cases registered.
Conviction rate
53.3%
Of the 15,84,487 trials completed — not of cases registered.
Convictions per 100 cases in court
4.6%
Against all 1,84,27,760 cases before the courts during the year.

What happens to 100 cases

NCRB publishes cases registered, chargesheeted, tried and convicted, and the rates between them. It never draws the shape. Drawn, the shape is the finding.

What happens to 100 criminal cases in India, 2024Registered: 100 out of 100, being cases registered in 2024. Investigated: 100 out of 100, being cases registered in 2024. Chargesheeted: 72.1 out of 100, being cases the police finished with in 2024. Trial completed: 8.6 out of 100, being cases before the courts in 2024. Convicted: 4.6 out of 100, being cases before the courts in 2024. The largest single drop is between Chargesheeted and Trial completed.Registered100 /10035,44,608 cases, out of all cases registered in 2024Investigated100 /10035,44,501 cases, out of all cases registered in 2024Chargesheeted72.1 /10025,40,668 cases, out of all cases the police finished with in 2024Trial completed8.6 /10015,84,487 cases, out of all cases before the courts in 2024Convicted4.6 /1008,45,098 cases, out of all cases before the courts in 2024

This is not one hundred cases followed through time. The trial figures are dominated by cases registered in earlier years — 15.9 million of the 18.4 million cases before the courts in 2024 were carried in from before it — so the police stages and the court stages are measured against different populations, and each stage above says which. A case registered in 2024 does not usually reach a verdict in 2024.

Registered

35,44,608

A cognizable IPC or BNS offence recorded by the police during 2024. Cases the police never registered are not in this data at all.[1]

Investigated

35,44,501

Almost every registered case is investigated: NCRB records only 107 cases nationally as not investigated. The attrition is not here.[1]

Chargesheeted

25,40,668

The police completed the investigation and sent the case to court. The other 28 were closed with a final report — most of them recorded as true but without enough evidence to charge anyone.[1]

Trial completed

15,84,487

This is the collapse. Of every 100 cases a criminal court was holding during 2024 — the 15.9 million carried in from earlier years plus the 2.5 million that arrived — fewer than nine reached the end of a trial.[2]

Convicted

8,45,098

Convictions as a share of everything the courts were holding. NCRB’s published conviction rate of 53.3% is this number measured only against the trials that finished.[2]

Download the funnel as CSV

Crime did not fall by six per cent

NCRB's own summary for 2024 reports a fall. In the same volume, its glossary records that three crime heads stopped being counted.

“It shows a decrease of 3,55,702 (6.0%) in registration of cases over 2023 (62,41,569 Cases). Crime rate registered per lakh population has decreased from 448.3 in 2023 to 418.9 in 2024.”[3]

That is arithmetically correct on the figures as published. But 2024 is the first year those figures exclude three heads the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita makes non-cognizable. NCRB says so in its glossary: “Keeping in view of notification of new criminal law BNS, non-cognizable offences viz, Voluntarily causing Simple Hurt (Section 323 IPC), Offences relating to Adulteration or sale of food/drugs (272-276 IPC) and Criminal intimidation (Section 506 IPC) heads have been excluded.”[3]

When those heads were last counted they carried 4,63,864 cases between them.GetNyay calculation We are not estimating 2024 — nobody can, because they are no longer collected. The point is narrower: a fall cannot be read as a fall in offending when the counting rule changed in the same year, in the same direction, by that order of magnitude. The same volume also splits the year between two statutes — 19,03,047 offences under the Penal Code to 30 June and 16,41,561 under the Sanhita after it, inside the same heads.

The three heads no longer counted

Crime heads excluded from Crime in India 2024 because the BNS makes them non-cognizable
HeadSectionLast count (2022)
Voluntarily Causing Simple Hurts. 323 IPC3,08,238
Offences relating to Adulteration or Sale of Food and Drugsss. 272–276 IPC4,694
Criminal Intimidations. 506 IPC1,50,932

Last published counts, Crime in India 2022 Table 1.2. These are not 2024 figures and are not estimates of 2024 figures — the heads are not collected any more.

Recorded crime since 1981

The rate of recorded crime per lakh of population, as far back as NCRB publishes it. The line stops before the last point on purpose.

Cognizable Penal Code and Sanhita crime rate per lakh, 1981 to 2024

Per lakh of NCRB's projected population. The series is broken at the last point because the basis changed.

A line of the recorded crime rate per lakh of population from 1981 to 2024. It rises from 200.8 in 1981 to a peak of 314.3 in 2020, and stands at 252.3 in 2024. The line is deliberately broken before 2024, because from that year NCRB counts two different statutes and three fewer crime heads, so the last point is not comparable with the ones before it.0501001502002503003508590950005101520series breaks252.3cases per lakh of population

The rate rose through the 2010s to a peak of 314.3 per lakh in 2020 and stands at 252.3 in 2024. The 2024 point is drawn detached rather than joined, because it counts two statutes and three fewer crime heads than every point before it. Joining it would draw a fall that is partly a change in the counting rule.

Crime in India 2024, Volume I, at-a-glance series, and Table 1.1 for the final year. Rates are per lakh of a population projection made in 2020 from the 2011 Census; there has been no census since.[3]

The gap between charging and convicting

Police complete an investigation far more often than a court convicts. How far apart the two sit is a State-level fact, and the spread is extraordinary.

Chargesheeting rate against conviction rate, by State and Union Territory, 2024

Sorted by the gap between the two, widest first. Both are percentages, on their own denominators.

  • Chargesheeting rate (of cases police disposed of)
  • Conviction rate (of trials completed)
Chargesheeting rate against conviction rate, by State and Union Territory, 2024Two bars for each of the 36 States and Union Territories: the share of cases the police chargesheeted, and the share of completed trials that ended in conviction. Sorted by the gap between the two, widest first. West Bengal has the widest gap, at 90.6 per cent chargesheeted against 7.1 per cent convicted. In most jurisdictions the police complete an investigation more often than a court convicts, but in 6 the order is reversed.0%100%West Bengal90.67.1Himachal Pradesh80.722.1A&N Islands86.829.6Goa73.917.1D&N Haveli and Daman & Diu63.48.4Chhattisgarh78.530.6Madhya Pradesh83.737.3Odisha75.130.1Tripura74.329.6Andhra Pradesh87.244.1Assam64.122.3Bihar73.439Gujarat90.256.2Jharkhand64.830.8Punjab68.734.7Karnataka74.642.3Jammu & Kashmir7851.4Maharashtra75.650.9Arunachal Pradesh53.934Sikkim39.920.3Haryana44.324.9Chandigarh63.646.7Tamil Nadu74.461Telangana73.860.4Kerala94.583.4Uttarakhand67.161Rajasthan49.145.9Puducherry9187.9Lakshadweep52.350Nagaland58.157.2Meghalaya20.825.4Uttar Pradesh76.784.5Ladakh75.687.5Manipur10.433.3Mizoram67.795.6Delhi31.974.1

West Bengal has the widest gap: 90.6% of cases chargesheeted against 7.1% of completed trials ending in conviction. The gap runs the other way in 6 jurisdictions, including Delhi, where a low chargesheeting rate sits beside a high conviction rate — so this is a difference between two percentages on two different denominators, not a measure of cases falling away. States/UTs may not be compared purely on the basis of crime figures.

Crime in India 2024, State and UT tables.[3] NCRB marks Manipur’s pending-investigation data provisional, pending clarifications from the State. Manipur’s 10.4% chargesheeting rate — the lowest in India — rests on that provisional base, and NCRB prints the State with an asterisk.

Every State and Union Territory: cases registered, crime rate, chargesheeting rate and conviction rate, 2024
State or UTRegisteredRate per lakhChargesheetedConvictedGap
Uttar Pradesh4,30,552180.276.7%84.5%-7.8
Maharashtra3,83,044300.075.6%50.9%24.7
Madhya Pradesh2,82,874321.683.7%37.3%46.4
Delhi2,75,4021258.531.9%74.1%-42.2
Bihar2,38,753184.873.4%39%34.4
Rajasthan2,13,352259.649.1%45.9%3.2
Tamil Nadu1,97,149255.574.4%61%13.4
Telangana1,90,704497.773.8%60.4%13.4
Kerala1,84,528513.094.5%83.4%11.1
Odisha1,71,193366.975.1%30.1%45.0
Gujarat1,65,419227.790.2%56.2%34.0
West Bengal1,57,909158.390.6%7.1%83.5
Karnataka1,38,784203.374.6%42.3%32.3
Andhra Pradesh1,16,076217.487.2%44.1%43.1
Haryana1,13,101368.544.3%24.9%19.4
Chhattisgarh72,410236.378.5%30.6%47.9
Punjab47,677153.868.7%34.7%34.0
Jharkhand47,250117.764.8%30.8%34.0
Assam39,816110.164.1%22.3%41.8
Jammu & Kashmir22,577164.478%51.4%26.6
Uttarakhand15,853134.467.1%61%6.1
Himachal Pradesh12,071160.680.7%22.1%58.6
Manipur4,572140.210.4%33.3%-22.9
Chandigarh3,621290.463.6%46.7%16.9
Puducherry3,515207.491%87.9%3.1
Meghalaya3,23395.520.8%25.4%-4.6
Tripura2,99471.474.3%29.6%44.7
Mizoram2,701215.767.7%95.6%-27.9
Arunachal Pradesh2,479156.953.9%34%19.9
Goa2,121133.873.9%17.1%56.8
Nagaland80235.558.1%57.2%0.9
D&N Haveli and Daman & Diu54038.963.4%8.4%55.0
A&N Islands522129.286.8%29.6%57.2
Sikkim50772.739.9%20.3%19.6
Ladakh460152.375.6%87.5%-11.9
Lakshadweep4768.152.3%50%2.3
Download the crime-head CSV

Every crime head, and the section in force today

NCRB’s crime heads were built on the Indian Penal Code, and the Penal Code was replaced on 1 July 2024. This table carries each head across to the provision that governs it now. Where a head does not map to a single section, the row says so rather than forcing a match — those are the informative rows.

Largest crime heads by cases registered, 2024

The 10 largest heads, with the remaining 58 grouped.

Cognizable IPC and BNS crimes registered by crime head, India, 2024Horizontal bars of the largest crime heads by cases registered in 2024, longest first. Theft, 6,21,945; Hurt, 4,41,996; Rash Driving on Public way, 4,35,173; Forgery, Cheating & Fraud, 1,92,382; Causing Death by Negligence, 1,69,493; Obstruction on Public way, 1,42,115; Cruelty by Husband or his Relatives, 1,20,227; Burglary, 1,07,532; Kidnapping and Abduction, 96,079; Attempt to Commit Murder, 58,844. The remaining 58 heads together account for 11,58,822 cases.Theft6,21,945Hurt4,41,996Rash Driving on Public way4,35,173Forgery, Cheating & Fraud1,92,382Causing Death by Negligence1,69,493Obstruction on Public way1,42,115Cruelty by Husband or his Relativ…1,20,227Burglary1,07,532Kidnapping and Abduction96,079Attempt to Commit Murder58,844All other heads (58)11,58,822

The 10 largest named heads account for 23,85,786 of the 35,44,608 cases registered. The remainder holds 58 heads and NCRB’s own residual bucket, “Other BNS/IPC crimes”, which alone outranks every head below third place — we keep a bucket out of a ranking of offences.

Crime in India 2024, crime-head tables.[3] Heads excluded from 2024 under the Sanhita are not shown here; they are in the section above.

Heads mapped
97
Penal Code and Sanhita heads carried across.
One section
42
The head is defined by a single BNS section.
Several sections
52
A range, or one sub-section rather than the whole section.
No equivalent
3
Dropped from the count, or with nothing taking its place.
NCRB crime head mapped to its IPC section and the BNS section in force
Crime headSections, as NCRB defines the headMappingCases 2024
RapeSection 64 to Section 71 BNS / Section 376 IPCNCRB defines the head as the whole range BNS 64 to 71 — eight provisions, from the punishment for rape to gang rape — so the figure is not a count of BNS 64 cases and is not attached to our BNS 64 page. The MHA concordance maps s. 376 IPC alone to BNS 64 and 65(1); the rest of the range answers to ss. 376A to 376E.Several sections29,536
Attempt to Commit RapeSection 64-68,70-71 r/w Sec 62 BNS Sec 376 r/w 511 IPCSeven substantive provisions read with the attempt section, BNS 62. There is no single section for attempted rape.Several sections2,561
Sexual Intercourse by employing deceitful meansSection 69 BNSBNS 69 is new: the MHA concordance lists it among the provisions with no IPC predecessor, which is why the head has no IPC column and no figures before 2024.One section1,325
Disclosure of Identity of VictimSection 72(1) BNSCounted under sub-section 72(1) only. We have no BNS 72 page.Sub-section11
Assault or use of Criminal Force to woman with intent to outrage her modestySection 74 BNS/Sec 354 IPCThe glossary defines this head as s. 74 BNS alone; the rest of the old s. 354 family (354A to 354D) is counted under separate heads at Sl 6 to 9. The MHA concordance agrees: s. 354 IPC maps to BNS 74 and nothing else.One section48,303
Sexual HarassmentSection 75 BNS/ Section 354A IPCOne section15,609
Assault or Use of criminal force to women with intent to disrobeSection 76 BNS / Section 354B IPCOne section8,409
VoyeurismSection 77 BNS /Section 354C IPCOne section1,722
StalkingSection 78 BNS /Section 354D IPCOne section9,865
Insult modesty of womenSection 79 BNS/Section 509 IPCOne section9,338
Dowry DeathSection 80 BNS /Section 304B IPCOne section5,737
Cruelty by Husband or RelativesSection 85 BNS /Section 498-A IPCOne section1,20,227
Kidnapping, abducting or inducing Women to compel her for marriageSection 87 BNS /Section 366 IPCOne section28,949
Offences of MiscarriageSection 89 and 90 BNS /Section 313 and 314 IPCTwo sections: causing miscarriage without the woman’s consent (89) and death caused by an act done with intent to cause miscarriage (90).Several sections299
FoeticideSection 91 BNS /Section 315 IPCOne section140
InfanticideSection 92 BNS /Section 316 IPCA trap for anyone reading section numbers across the two Codes: the IPC section here is 316, and BNS 316 is criminal breach of trust, an unrelated offence at Sl 71.One section56
Exposure and AbandonmentSection 93 & 94 BNS /Section 317 & 318 IPCTwo sections. Note again the numbering trap: IPC 318 is concealment of birth, while BNS 318 is cheating.Several sections737
Hiring, employing or engaging a child to commit an offenceSection 95 BNSNew in the BNS; no IPC predecessor in the MHA concordance.One section1
Procuration of ChildrenSection 96 BNS /Section 366A IPCOne section1,673
Kidnapping or abducting child with intent to steal from its personsSection 97 BNS/Section 369 IPCOne section16
Selling of Child for prostitutionSection 98 BNS /Section 372 IPCOne section12
Buying of Child for prostitutionSection 99 BNS /Section 373 IPCOne section4
MurderSection 103 (1) BNS /Section 302 IPCThe head is narrower than the section our page covers: NCRB counts s. 103(1) only, and s. 103(2) — murder by a group of five or more — is a separate head at Sl 24. Table 1.2 prints 27,049 for “Murder” as a whole, which is this figure plus Sl 24 and Sl 25. The MHA concordance maps s. 302 IPC to BNS 103 without naming a sub-section; NCRB is the finer of the two here, and correctly so, because s. 103(2) is new.Sub-section26,927
Murder by Group (of 5 or more persons)Section 103 (2) BNSA new offence with no IPC predecessor, counted under s. 103(2) alone. The head is narrower than the section our BNS 103 page covers, and the 112 cases are all from the six months the BNS was in force in 2024.Sub-section112
Murder by life ConvictSection 104 BNS /Section 303 IPCAnother numbering trap: IPC 303 became BNS 104, while BNS 303 is theft.One section10
Culpable Homicide not amounting to MurderSection 105 BNS/Section 304 IPCOne section3,868
Causing Death by NegligenceSection 106 BNS /Section 304-A IPCOne section1,69,493
Abetment of SuicideSection 107/108 BNS /Section 305/306 IPCTwo sections: abetment of the suicide of a child or a person of unsound mind (107) and abetment of suicide generally (108). The count is not a count of BNS 108 cases, so it is not attached to our BNS 108 page.Several sections8,893
Attempt to commit MurderSection 109 BNS /Section 307 IPCOne section58,844
Attempt to commit Culpable HomicideSection 110 BNS /Section 308 IPCOne section13,385
Organised CrimeSection 111 BNSNew in the BNS. All 840 cases fall in the six months from 1 July 2024.One section840
Petty organised CrimeSection 112 BNSNew in the BNS.One section876
Terrorist actSection 113 BNSNew in the BNS, and it runs alongside the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act rather than replacing it, so the 24 cases are not the national count of terrorism prosecutions.One section24
Voluntarily Causing Grievous HurtSection 117(2) BNS /Section 325 IPCCounted under s. 117(2) only, not the whole of s. 117. Table 1.2 does not publish this head separately: it is inside the aggregate head “Hurt”, 441,996 cases in 2024, which spans Sl 34 to Sl 42.Sub-sectionnot counted
Grievous hurt resulting Persistent vegetative State or Permanent DisabilitySection 117(3) BNSSub-section 117(3) only. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Hurt” head, 441,996 cases.Sub-sectionnot counted
Grievous hurt caused by a group of 5 or more personsSection 117(4) BNSSub-section 117(4) only, a provision new in the BNS. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Hurt” head, 441,996 cases.Sub-sectionnot counted
Voluntarily causing hurt or Grievous Hurt by Dangerous weapons or meansSec.118(1)(2) BNS /Section 324/326 IPCBoth sub-sections of s. 118 and nothing else, so the head is narrower than the section but wider than one sub-section. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Hurt” head, 441,996 cases.Sub-sectionnot counted
Voluntarily Causing hurt or Grievous Hurt/Assault or Criminal force to deter public servant from his dutySection 121(1)/121/(2) or 121(1/2)r/w Sec. 132 BNS) & (Section 332/333/353 IPCTwo sections, hurt to a public servant (121) read with assault to deter a public servant (132). NCRB’s own cell is malformed — “121/(2)” and an unclosed bracket — and is reproduced as printed. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Hurt” head, 441,996 cases.Several sectionsnot counted
Acid attackSection 124 (1) BNS /Section 326A IPCSub-section 124(1) only; 124(2) is the attempt, at Sl 40. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Hurt” head, 441,996 cases.Sub-sectionnot counted
Attempt to Acid AttackSection 124 (2) BNS /Section 326B IPCSub-section 124(2) only. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Hurt” head, 441,996 cases.Sub-sectionnot counted
Act endangering life or personal safety of othersSection 125 (a) (b)) & (Section 336-338 IPCClauses (a) and (b) of s. 125. The MHA concordance maps s. 336 IPC to s. 125 with no clause, and ss. 337 and 338 to 125(a) and 125(b), so NCRB’s clause pairing does not fully account for the IPC range it prints. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Hurt” head, 441,996 cases.Sub-sectionnot counted
Other Sections of Hurt or Grievous HurtSection 119 (1) (2),120(1) (2),122(2) & 123) & (Section 327-331, 334-335 IPCFour sections. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Hurt” head, 441,996 cases; Table 1.2 does publish a sub-row “Other Grevious Hurt” (20,168) but does not say it is this head, so no figure is attached.Several sectionsnot counted
Wrongful Restraint/Confinement126 & 127 BNS /Section 341 to 348 IPCTwo sections — restraint (126) and confinement (127) — so the figure is not a count of BNS 126 cases and is not attached to our BNS 126 page. Eight IPC sections collapsed into two BNS sections with eight sub-sections between them.Several sections50,881
Kidnapping and AbductionSection 137 & 138 BNS / Section 363 IPCTwo sections, kidnapping (137) and abduction (138). Table 1.2 publishes one aggregate “Kidnapping and Abduction” head of 96,079 cases covering Sl 44 to Sl 49, and no figure for this head alone.Several sectionsnot counted
Kidnapping and Abduction for the Purpose of BeggingSection 139 /Section 363A IPCMaps cleanly to BNS 139, but Table 1.2 counts it inside the aggregate “Kidnapping and Abduction” head, 96,079 cases, and publishes no separate figure.One sectionnot counted
Kidnapping and Abduction in order to MurderSection 140(1) BNS /Section 364 IPCSub-section 140(1) only. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Kidnapping and Abduction” head, 96,079 cases.Sub-sectionnot counted
Kidnapping for Ransom, etc.Section 140(2) BNS /Section 364A IPCSub-section 140(2) only. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Kidnapping and Abduction” head, 96,079 cases.Sub-sectionnot counted
Importation of Girl or Boy from Foreign CountrySection 141 BNS /Section 366-B IPC (Girl upto 21 yrs Boy upto 18 yrs)Maps cleanly to BNS 141, but Table 1.2 counts it inside the aggregate “Kidnapping and Abduction” head, 96,079 cases.One sectionnot counted
Other Kidnapping & AbductionSec. 140(3), 140(4), 142 BNS / Seciton 365, 367-368 IPCTwo sections and three sub-provisions. NCRB’s cell misspells “Section”; it is reproduced as printed. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Kidnapping and Abduction” head, 96,079 cases.Several sectionsnot counted
Act endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of IndiaSec 152 BNSNew in the BNS, and the provision that occupies the ground s. 124A IPC (sedition) used to hold — the concordance records no BNS successor for s. 124A at all. Table 1.2 counts it inside one “Offences against State” head of 83 cases.One sectionnot counted
Other offences against StateSection 147-151 & Section 153-158 BNS /Section 121,121A, 122,123 IPCEleven sections in two ranges. Counted inside Table 1.2’s single “Offences against State” head, 83 cases.Several sectionsnot counted
Unlawful AssemblySection 189 (2) (3) (4) /Section 143-145 IPCThree sub-sections of s. 189 and nothing else; the rest of s. 189 is counted under Rioting at Sl 53. We have no BNS 189 page.Sub-section7,074
RiotingSection 190, 189(6), 189(5), 191(2),191(3) BNS) /Section 147-151 IPCThree sections, and it shares s. 189 with the Unlawful Assembly head at Sl 52 — the two heads are divided by sub-section, not by section.Several sections30,348
Promoting enmity between groups on ground of religion, race, place of Birth etc.Sec 196 BNS) /Section 153A IPCOne section1,601
Imputation, assertions prejudicial to national integrationSection 197 BNS /Section 153B IPCOne section40
AffraySection 194 BNSNCRB prints no IPC column for this head, although the concordance maps ss. 159 and 160 IPC to BNS 194(1) and 194(2).One section5,286
Household Theft (Dwelling Units/Houses)Section 305(a) BNSClause (a) of s. 305 only. Table 1.2 publishes one aggregate “Theft” head of 621,945 cases covering Sl 57 to Sl 63, and no figure for this head alone.Sub-sectionnot counted
Vehicle TheftSection 305(b) / Section 379 IPCClause (b) of s. 305 only. The MHA concordance maps s. 379 IPC to BNS 303(2), not to 305, which answers to s. 380 IPC — the head’s IPC column is the punishment section for theft generally, not for theft of a vehicle. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Theft” head, 621,945 cases.Sub-sectionnot counted
Theft from VehiclesSection 305(c)Clause (c) of s. 305 only. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Theft” head, 621,945 cases.Sub-sectionnot counted
Theft of idol or icon from Place of WorshipSection 305(d)Clause (d) of s. 305 only. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Theft” head, 621,945 cases.Sub-sectionnot counted
Theft of Government PropertySection 305(e)Clause (e) of s. 305 only. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Theft” head, 621,945 cases.Sub-sectionnot counted
Theft by servant/employeeSection 306 BNSMaps cleanly to BNS 306, but Table 1.2 counts it inside the aggregate “Theft” head, 621,945 cases.One sectionnot counted
Theft / Other TheftSection 305/307 BNS / Section 379 IPCTwo sections. Nothing in NCRB’s glossary is defined as BNS 303 alone, so the Theft page in our cluster has no head of its own: the aggregate “Theft” head in Table 1.2, 621,945 cases, spans BNS 303 to 307 across Sl 57 to Sl 63.Several sectionsnot counted
SnatchingSection 304 BNSNew in the BNS; all 12,644 cases fall in the six months from 1 July 2024, which is why the head has no 2023 figure to be compared with.One section12,644
ExtortionSection 308 BNS /Section 384-389 IPCSix IPC sections collapsed into the sub-sections of one BNS section, so on the BNS side it maps cleanly. We have no BNS 308 page.One section12,119
RobberySection 309 (4), 309(6), 311 BNS/Section 392/394/397 IPCTwo sections, and s. 311 is shared with the Dacoity head at Sl 67, so the two heads cannot be added without double counting the provision.Several sections23,145
DacoitySection 310 (2 & 3)/311 BNS / Section 395-397 IPCTwo sections, sharing s. 311 with Robbery at Sl 66.Several sections2,393
Attempt to Commit Dacoity/RobberySection 309(5) & 312 BNS /Section 393/398 IPCTwo sections.Several sections387
Making Preparation and Assembly for committing DacoitySection 310(4) & 310(5) BNS /Section 399 & 402 IPCTwo sub-sections of s. 310 and nothing else, so the head is narrower than the section; the rest of s. 310 is counted under Dacoity at Sl 67. We have no BNS 310 page.Sub-section2,998
Criminal MisappropriationSection 314 / 315 r/w other BNS Crimes /Section 403/404 IPCTwo sections, and NCRB’s own definition leaves the boundary open with “r/w other BNS Crimes”.Several sections231
Criminal Breach of TrustSection 316 BNS /Section 406-409 IPCFour IPC sections became the sub-sections of one BNS section, so the head maps cleanly on the BNS side even though it does not on the IPC side.One section21,251
Dishonestly Receiving/Dealing-in Stolen PropertySection 317 BNS /Section 411-414 IPCOne section9,358
BurglarySection 329(4),332-334 r/w Section 303 or 331 r/w 305 BNS /Section 454-460 r/w 380 IPCSeven BNS sections, read with the theft provisions. This is the single most compound head in the glossary, and the reason our BNS 303 page carries no NCRB figure: part of this head’s 107,532 cases are s. 303 cases and nobody can say what part.Several sections1,07,532
Counterfeit CoinSection 178-181,187-188 BNS / Section 231-235, 237, 238-240 & 242-254 IPCSix BNS sections, and ss. 178 to 181 are shared with three other heads — Government stamps (Sl 75) and currency notes (Sl 77) are counted under the same provisions. Table 1.2 publishes one aggregate “Counterfeiting” head of 746 cases covering Sl 74 to Sl 77.Several sectionsnot counted
Counterfeiting Government StampSection 178-181, 183-186 BNS /Section 255-260 IPCEight BNS sections, overlapping Sl 74 and Sl 77. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Counterfeiting” head, 746 cases.Several sectionsnot counted
Counterfeiting of Seal or MarkSection 341 (1)(2)(3)(4) BNS /Section 472/473 IPC) (341(2)(3)NCRB’s cell contradicts itself — it names sub-sections (1) to (4) and then trails “(341(2)(3)” — and is reproduced exactly as printed. The MHA concordance maps only ss. 472 and 473 IPC here, to BNS 341(1) and 341(2); 341(3) and (4) are new in the BNS and have no IPC counterpart, so the head as defined is wider than the IPC sections beside it. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Counterfeiting” head, 746 cases.Sub-sectionnot counted
Counterfeit currency & Bank notesSection 178-181 BNS /Section 489-A to 489-E IPCFour BNS sections, the same four as Sl 74 and part of Sl 75. The concordance also maps s. 489E IPC to BNS 182, which NCRB’s range does not reach. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Counterfeiting” head, 746 cases.Several sectionsnot counted
FraudSection 318(4) r/w Section 336(2)(3)(4), 340(2) BNS/IT Act /Section 420 r/w 465,468-471 IPC/IT ActThree BNS sections read together, plus the Information Technology Act, so part of this head is not a BNS offence at all. Table 1.2 publishes one aggregate “Forgery, Cheating & Fraud” head of 192,382 cases covering Sl 78 to Sl 80.Several sectionsnot counted
CheatingSection 318 (4) BNS) /Section 420 IPC/ r/w IT ActNCRB counts s. 318(4) — cheating with dishonest inducement to deliver property — and not the whole of s. 318, so the head is narrower than the section our BNS 318 page covers: simple cheating under s. 318(2) is not in it. Table 1.2 counts it inside the aggregate “Forgery, Cheating & Fraud” head, 192,382 cases; the separate figure of 116,219 for Cheating comes from Table 17A.1 (Sl 53B) and is carried in src/lib/bareAct/ncrb.ts.Sub-sectionnot counted
ForgerySection 338,336(3)(4),340(2),339 BNS /Section 467-469,471-474 IPC/ r/w IT ActFour BNS sections. Counted inside Table 1.2’s aggregate “Forgery, Cheating & Fraud” head, 192,382 cases.Several sectionsnot counted
Abetment outside India for Offence in IndiaSection 48 BNSNew in the BNS. One case nationally in 2024.One section1
Offences relating to ElectionsSection 173 to 177 BNS/ 171-e to 171-I IPCFive sections. The MHA concordance has no row at all for s. 171-I IPC and none for BNS 177, so the two ends of NCRB’s range are the one pairing the concordance cannot confirm.Several sections2,041
Disobedience to order duly promulgated by Public ServantSection 223 BNS /Section 188 IPCOne section56,087
Harbouring an OffenderSection 249/253/254 BNS /Section 212/216/216A IPCThree sections.Several sections60
Rash Driving on Public waySection 281 or Section 281 r/w Section 125(a)(b) BNS/Section 279 or 279 r/w 336-338 IPCTwo sections: s. 281 alone, or s. 281 read with s. 125. It shares s. 125 with the head at Sl 41, so the two cannot be added.Several sections4,35,173
Obstruction on Public waySection 285 BNS /Section 283 IPCOne section1,42,115
Sale of obscene Books/ObjectsSection 294 & 295 BNS /Section 292-293 IPCTwo sections: sale of obscene material generally (294) and sale to a young person (295).Several sections92
Obscene acts and songs at public PlacesSection 296 BNS /Section 294 IPCA numbering trap worth naming: IPC 294 is this offence, and BNS 294 is the sale of obscene material at Sl 87.One section40,919
Offences relating to ReligionSection 298 to 301 BNS /Section 295-297 IPCFour BNS sections. NCRB writes the IPC side as 295-297, which on the concordance is four provisions because s. 295A sits inside that range.Several sections2,306
Cheating by ImpersonationSection 319 BNS /Section 419 IPCOne section713
Offences related to Mischief324(5)(6),326(a)(b)(c)(d) BNS /Section 428-433 IPCTwo sections. The BNS and IPC sides do not line up on the concordance: ss. 428 and 429 IPC map to BNS 325, which the head does not name, while BNS 324(5) is new in the BNS and 324(6) answers to s. 440 IPC, which is outside the range NCRB prints.Several sections5,361
ArsonSection 326(f),326(G) & 327 (2) BNS /Section 435,436 & 438 IPCTwo sections, and s. 326 is shared with the Mischief head at Sl 91.Several sections7,508
Criminal TrespassSection 329(3) BNS /Section 447-252 IPCSub-section 329(3) only. NCRB prints the IPC range as “447-252”, which is a typo for 447-452 and is reproduced as printed; and on the concordance that range is not one sub-section but four provisions — 447 to 329(3), 448 to 329(4), 449 to 451 to s. 332 and 452 to s. 333.Sub-section38,702
Circulate False/Fake News/RumoursSection 353 BNS/ Section 353 r/w IT Act /Section 505 IPC r/w IT ActAnother numbering trap: IPC 353 (assault to deter a public servant) became BNS 132, while BNS 353 is this offence and answers to s. 505 IPC.One section2,403
Voluntarily Causing Simple HurtVoluntarily causing Simple Hurt (Section 323 IPC)Excluded from the 2024 cognizable heads: the BNS makes the offence non-cognizable, so NCRB stopped counting it and the head has no entry in the 2024 glossary. The provision still exists — the MHA concordance maps s. 323 IPC to BNS 115(2), which our BNS 115 page covers — but nothing counts it, so the row carries no figure and no link. The last published figure is 3,08,238 cases, Crime in India 2022, Table 1.2. That is not an estimate of 2024; it is the last count that exists.No equivalentnot counted
Offences relating to Adulteration or Sale of Food and DrugsOffences relating to Adulteration or sale of food/drugs (272-276 IPC)Excluded from the 2024 cognizable heads as non-cognizable under the BNS. The five IPC sections map on the concordance to BNS 274 to 278, so there is no single successor provision and no link. Last published figure 4,694 cases, Crime in India 2022, Table 1.2.No equivalentnot counted
Criminal IntimidationCriminal intimidation (Section 506 IPC)Excluded from the 2024 cognizable heads as non-cognizable under the BNS. The concordance maps s. 506 IPC to BNS 351(2) and 351(3), and our BNS 351 page explains that the offence is non-cognizable throughout; the row carries no link because there is no 2024 head behind it. Last published figure 1,50,932 cases, Crime in India 2022, Table 1.2 — the largest single head to leave the national crime statistics.No equivalentnot counted

The section numbers are NCRB’s own, from the glossary published with the volume, and were checked against the Ministry of Home Affairs corresponding-section table.[5] Where a head links, it goes to our page on that section. If you are converting a section number the other way, the IPC to BNS converter covers the whole Code, not just the heads NCRB counts.

Download the mapping CSV

The full dataset, and where else to get it

Three CSVs, free, no signup. If another source serves you better, it is named here with the reason.

The three CSV files published with this page
FileWhat it holds
crime-funnel.csvWhat happens to 100 cases, with the basis of each stage.
crime-heads.csvEvery NCRB crime head with cases registered in 2024.
crime-head-bns-mapping.csvEvery crime head mapped to the IPC section and the BNS section in force.

NCRB itself

The primary source: three volumes as PDF, plus 293 individual 2024 tables as PDF and XLSX.

Authoritative, and everything here comes from it. No CSV, no API. The 2023 and 2024 files share one flat directory with near-identical names — TABLE11.xlsx is Table 1.1 of 2023, TABLE119.xlsx is Table 1.1 of 2024 — so a guessed filename can silently give the wrong year.

dataful.in

An NCRB collection of 14 datasets covering 2001 to 2024, free as CSV, XLSX and PARQUET, at year, State, crime-head and city granularity.

They cover a far longer period than this page does, and for the full time series in a spreadsheet you should go to them rather than to us. What they do not do is interpret — the collection is download cards, with no charts or findings. Watch one thing: their series merges the post-July-2024 BNS heads into the IPC series, which is the comparability problem this page breaks its own chart over.

OpenCity

A CKAN mirror of the NCRB volumes and 14 of the 2024 tables, with a working API and no key required.

The most convenient machine-readable route to the original files. It mirrors NCRB rather than adding to it, and holds a subset of the tables.

data.gov.in

The Government’s open data platform, which has carried Crime in India catalogues in past years.

We could not verify it. Every catalogue page tried timed out or returned an empty JavaScript shell, and the public sample API key returned rate-limit then gateway errors. We record that we could not reach it rather than describe what it holds.

If you are here because something has happened to you

These figures describe whole systems, not your case. What matters for yours is which offence it is, which forum it goes to, and what you file.

Method, and what we deliberately did not calculate

Every figure here is read from a primary NCRB document and checked against NCRB's own arithmetic. Where a question cannot be answered honestly from this data, it is left unanswered and the reason is given.

Where the figures come from

Tables 17A.1 and 18A.1 of Crime in India 2024 for disposal, Volume I Table 1.1 for national totals and rates. NCRB publishes these as PDF and one XLSX per table. There is no CSV and no API anywhere on its site.

How they were extracted and checked

Each table was reconciled against the arithmetic NCRB prints in its own column headings — fifteen identities, such as “Total Charge sheeted (Col.16+Col.17)”. All hold, and Table 18A.1’s “Cases Sent for Trial” equals Table 17A.1’s “Total Charge sheeted” exactly, checking the two tables against each other. The build fails if any stops holding.

What the rates are rates of

Chargesheeting rate = charge sheets over cases the police disposed of. Conviction rate = convictions over trials completed. Both denominators are printed beside the rate, because quoting either as a share of cases registered is the commonest error made with this data.

Population and crime rates

Rates are per lakh of the Report of the Technical Group on Population Projections, July 2020, National Commission on Population, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. There has been no census since 2011, so every rate here is measured against a projection made in 2020. NCRB uses the actual 2011 Census population for the 19 metropolitan cities, which is why it warns that city rates and State rates are not comparable.

What was left out

Metropolitan-city tables, because NCRB uses a different population basis for them and warns they are not comparable with State figures. Special and Local Laws heads are in the national totals but are not mapped to BNS sections, not being Penal Code offences.

A caution about the 2024 front matter

The methodology chapter published with Crime in India 2024 still calls the reference year 2023 and carries an unfilled placeholder; the disclaimer still cites the 2022 population. The tables are correct and internally consistent. Nothing date-specific here comes from that front matter.

What we deliberately did not calculate

Why is there no ranking of States by crime rate?
A crime rate is a rate of recorded crime. A State where reporting is easy and the police register what is reported produces a higher number than one where they do not — and the higher number is the better-governed place. Ranking on it rewards under-registration, so we publish every State and refuse to order them by it.
Why is there no statement that crime is rising or falling?
Every change in a registration figure has at least two candidate explanations — the amount of crime, and the propensity to record it — and this data cannot separate them. A change in registration is reported as a change in registration.
Why is there no conviction rate per 100 cases registered?
No such cohort exists in the data. The cases convicted in 2024 were mostly registered earlier, and most registered in 2024 had not reached trial. Dividing one by the other gives a number with no referent. We give convictions against cases before the courts instead, and name that denominator.
Why is there no forecast of when the trial backlog clears?
The queue is stated as years of work at the current disposal rate, which describes the present. A forecast would need assumptions about filing and disposal that nothing in this data supports.

NCRB marks the cases-pending-investigation figures provisional, pending clarifications from Manipur.

Questions about these figures

What is the conviction rate in India?

NCRB puts it at 53.3% for 2024. That is convictions divided by the trials that were completed during the year — 8,45,098 convictions in 15,84,487 completed trials. It is not the share of reported crimes that end in conviction. Measured against every case that was before a criminal court during 2024, convictions were 4.6%.

How many crimes were registered in India in 2024?

NCRB recorded 35,44,608 cognizable offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and 23,41,259 under Special and Local Laws, for a total of 58,85,867. The crime rate was 252.3 per lakh for IPC and BNS offences and 418.9 per lakh for all cognizable crime.

Did crime in India fall in 2024?

Registered crime fell 6.0% against 2023 on NCRB’s own figures. But 2024 is the first year in which three crime heads were dropped from the count because the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita makes them non-cognizable, and when those heads were last counted they were worth about 4.64 lakh cases. A fall in registration is not the same as a fall in crime, and part of this one is a change in what gets counted.

Which is the latest NCRB Crime in India report?

Crime in India 2024. A Ministry of Home Affairs reply to the Lok Sabha, published by the Press Information Bureau on 21 July 2026, confirms the latest published report is for 2024. A March 2026 reply still said 2023, so the volume appeared between those dates. Nothing for 2025 exists yet.

Why do NCRB crime heads still cite Indian Penal Code sections?

Because the heads were built on the IPC and the statute changed underneath them. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita replaced the IPC on 1 July 2024, so the 2024 volume counts IPC offences for January to June and BNS offences from July to December within the same head. NCRB’s glossary gives both section numbers for each head, and the mapping table on this page carries them across to the section in force.

How many cases are pending trial in India?

At the end of 2024, 1,66,44,622 cases were pending trial for cognizable IPC and BNS offences — 90.3% of everything the criminal courts were holding. The courts disposed of 17,83,138 cases during the year, so the queue is about 9.3 years of work at that rate. That is a description of the present, not a forecast.

Sources

Every document behind a figure on this page, linked to the original. Nothing here is sourced from a news report or an aggregator.

  1. 1

    National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India 2024, Table 17A.1 — “Police Disposal of IPC/BNS Crime Cases (Crime Head-wise) – 2024”, read 26 September 2026.

    Every police-side figure on this page: cases pending investigation, registered, chargesheeted, closed by final report, and the chargesheeting rate with its denominator.

  2. 2

    National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India 2024, Table 18A.1 — “Court Disposal of IPC/BNS Crime Cases (Crime Head-wise) – 2024”, read 26 September 2026.

    Every court-side figure: cases pending trial, sent for trial, trials completed, convicted, acquitted and discharged, and the conviction rate with its denominator.

  3. 3

    National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India 2024, Volume III — “Crime in India 2024, Volume III”, read 26 September 2026.

    The volume the two disposal tables sit in, and NCRB’s own notes on what each column counts.

  4. 4

    National Crime Records Bureau, ncrb.gov.in, crime-in-india-table-content.html?year=2024 — “Crime in India 2024 — Table Contents listing”, read 26 September 2026.

    The per-table listing, which is the basis for this page’s statement about the formats NCRB releases: 293 individual XLSX files for 2024, no CSV and no API anywhere on the site.

  5. 5

    Ministry of Home Affairs (NCRB CyTrain copy), MHA corresponding-section table — “Corresponding sections — Indian Penal Code 1860 to Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023”, read 13 September 2026.

    The IPC-to-BNS concordance behind the crime-head mapping table. It is the same artefact as the UP Police comparative PDF, not an independent corroboration.

Use this data

Published under CC BY 4.0. Reuse anything here, including the charts, with credit.

GetNyay, “India Crime Data Tracker”, compiled from National Crime Records Bureau, Crime in India 2024, Tables 17A.1 and 18A.1. Updated 26 September 2026. CC BY 4.0. https://getnyay.in/data/crime
Ask GetNyay AI