IPC 506 (now BNS 351): criminal intimidationधारा 506 IPC (अब BNS 351): आपराधिक अभित्रास
The number IPC 503, 506 and 507 have now, what makes a threat an offence, which threats carry seven years, and why the police send you to a Magistrate.IPC 503, 506 और 507 अब कौन-सी धारा हैं, धमकी कब अपराध बनती है, किन धमकियों में सात वर्ष है, और पुलिस आपको मजिस्ट्रेट के पास क्यों भेजती है।
IPC 506 — punishment for criminal intimidation — is now section 351(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita: up to two years, or up to seven where the threat is of death, grievous hurt or the other graver harms listed. Section 351 replaced IPC sections 503, 506 and 507 for offences on or after 1 July 2024. An anonymous threat adds up to two years under 351(4). The central First Schedule to the BNSS classifies every form as non-cognizable and bailable, but saved State notifications can change that: in Uttar Pradesh, the Allahabad High Court has held 351(2) cognizable and non-bailable, so an FIR can be registered there (Vinay Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P., 3 October 2024).भारतीय दंड संहिता की धारा 506 — आपराधिक अभित्रास (धमकी) की सज़ा — अब भारतीय न्याय संहिता की धारा 351(2) और 351(3) है: दो वर्ष तक, या सात वर्ष तक जहाँ धमकी मृत्यु, गंभीर चोट या सूचीबद्ध अन्य गंभीर हानि की हो। धारा 351 ने 1 जुलाई 2024 या उसके बाद के अपराधों के लिए IPC की धारा 503, 506 और 507 की जगह ली है। गुमनाम धमकी पर 351(4) के तहत दो वर्ष तक अतिरिक्त। केंद्रीय प्रथम अनुसूची हर रूप को असंज्ञेय और ज़मानतीय बताती है, पर बचाई गई राज्य अधिसूचनाएँ इसे बदल सकती हैं: उत्तर प्रदेश में इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय ने 351(2) को संज्ञेय और अज़मानतीय माना है, इसलिए वहाँ FIR दर्ज हो सकती है (विनय कुमार पांडेय बनाम उ.प्र. राज्य, 3 अक्टूबर 2024)।
Punishes threatening someone with injury to their person, reputation or property — or to someone they care about — to alarm them or to make them act against their legal rights.किसी को उसके शरीर, प्रतिष्ठा या संपत्ति — या उसके किसी प्रियजन — को क्षति की धमकी देने की सज़ा देती है, ताकि वह डरे या अपने विधिक अधिकारों के विरुद्ध काम करे।
- Nowअब
- BNS 351 — Criminal intimidation
- Wasपहले
- IPC 503 / 506 / 507
- Punishmentसज़ा
- Up to 2 years, or fine, or both; up to 7 years for threats of death, grievous hurt and the other harms in 351(3); up to 2 years more if anonymous2 वर्ष तक, या जुर्माना, या दोनों; मृत्यु, गंभीर चोट और 351(3) की अन्य हानियों की धमकी पर 7 वर्ष तक; गुमनाम हो तो 2 वर्ष तक और
- Arrest without warrantबिना वारंट गिरफ़्तारी
- Non-cognizableअसंज्ञेय
- Bailज़मानत
- Bailableज़मानतीय
- Compoundingसमझौता (शमन)
- Depends on the sub-section — see belowउप-धारा पर निर्भर — नीचे देखें
- Tried byविचारण न्यायालय
- Any Magistrate / Magistrate of the first classकोई भी मजिस्ट्रेट / प्रथम श्रेणी मजिस्ट्रेट
- State differsराज्य में भिन्न
- Uttar Pradesh, Goa — see classificationUttar Pradesh, Goa — वर्गीकरण नीचे देखें
Read this first: पहले यह पढ़ें: The labels above are the central First Schedule’s, under which the police record what you report and refer you to a Magistrate (BNSS s. 174). Saved State notifications can change them. In Uttar Pradesh, 351(2) is cognizable and non-bailable — the Allahabad High Court held the 31 July 1989 U.P. notification saved by BNSS s. 531(2)(b) (Vinay Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P., 3 October 2024) — so the police there register an FIR. Only 351(2) and 351(3) can be compounded.ऊपर के वर्गीकरण केंद्रीय प्रथम अनुसूची के हैं, जिसके तहत पुलिस आपकी सूचना दर्ज करके आपको मजिस्ट्रेट के पास भेजती है (BNSS धारा 174)। बचाई गई राज्य अधिसूचनाएँ इन्हें बदल सकती हैं। उत्तर प्रदेश में 351(2) संज्ञेय और अज़मानतीय है — इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय ने BNSS धारा 531(2)(b) से बचाई गई 31 जुलाई 1989 की उ.प्र. अधिसूचना को लागू माना (विनय कुमार पांडेय बनाम उ.प्र. राज्य, 3 अक्टूबर 2024) — इसलिए वहाँ पुलिस FIR दर्ज करती है। केवल 351(2) और 351(3) में समझौता हो सकता है।
Several provisions of the Indian Penal Code were folded into one section of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, landing in its sub-sections. So the new number alone is not the answer — the sub-section is.
| IPC 503 | becomes BNS 351(1) | merged |
|---|---|---|
| IPC 506 | becomes BNS 351(2), 351(3) | merged |
| IPC 507 | becomes BNS 351(4) | merged |
Key takeaways
- IPC 503 became 351(1), IPC 506 became 351(2) and 351(3), and IPC 507 became 351(4); all four now sit in one section.
- A threat of death, grievous hurt, arson, a serious offence, or of imputing unchastity to a woman moves the maximum from two years to seven (s. 351(3)).
- Under the central First Schedule it is non-cognizable: the police record the information and refer you to the Magistrate, and cannot investigate without the Magistrate’s order (BNSS s. 174). State notifications saved by BNSS s. 531(2)(b) can alter this — in Uttar Pradesh, 351(2) is cognizable and non-bailable.
- The person intimidated can settle a case under 351(2) or 351(3) without the court’s permission; 351(4) is not compoundable at all (BNSS s. 359).
- If the same facts also disclose a cognizable offence, such as extortion, the whole case is treated as cognizable (BNSS s. 174(4)).
मुख्य बातें
- IPC 503 अब 351(1) है, IPC 506 अब 351(2) और 351(3), और IPC 507 अब 351(4); चारों अब एक ही धारा में हैं।
- मृत्यु, गंभीर चोट, आगज़नी, गंभीर अपराध, या किसी महिला पर असतीत्व का लांछन लगाने की धमकी पर अधिकतम सज़ा दो से सात वर्ष हो जाती है (धारा 351(3))।
- केंद्रीय प्रथम अनुसूची के अनुसार यह असंज्ञेय है: पुलिस सूचना दर्ज करके आपको मजिस्ट्रेट के पास भेजती है, और मजिस्ट्रेट के आदेश के बिना जाँच नहीं कर सकती (BNSS धारा 174)। BNSS धारा 531(2)(b) से बचाई गई राज्य अधिसूचनाएँ इसे बदल सकती हैं — उत्तर प्रदेश में 351(2) संज्ञेय और अज़मानतीय है।
- धमकाया गया व्यक्ति 351(2) या 351(3) में न्यायालय की अनुमति के बिना समझौता कर सकता है; 351(4) शमनीय नहीं है (BNSS धारा 359)।
- यदि उन्हीं तथ्यों से कोई संज्ञेय अपराध भी बनता है, जैसे उद्दापन (extortion), तो पूरा मामला संज्ञेय माना जाता है (BNSS धारा 174(4))।
अपराध के तत्व, ज़मानत और गिरफ़्तारी का वर्गीकरण, सज़ा और प्रक्रिया का पूरा विश्लेषण नीचे अंग्रेज़ी में है।
What BNS 351 actually requires
Every part below has to be present. This is not a list of factors to be weighed — if one element is missing, the offence is not made out at all, however bad the conduct looks.
- A threat, by any means
The accused threatened another person. Section 351(1) says “by any means” and names no particular medium.
and - Of injury to person, reputation or property
Injury to the person threatened, or to the person or reputation of someone they are interested in — including the reputation of someone who has died (Explanation). “Injury” is any harm illegally caused, in body, mind, reputation or property (s. 2(14)).
and - With one of the intents the section names
To cause alarm to that person; or to make them do something they are not legally bound to do, or stop doing something they are legally entitled to do, as the way to avoid the threat being carried out.
Section 351(1) defines the offence; sub-sections (2) to (4) punish it. The Act’s own illustration: A threatens to burn B’s house to make B stop pursuing a civil suit — criminal intimidation.
A threat to cause:
- death or grievous hurt
- destroying property by fire
- an offence punishable with death, life, or up to seven years
- imputing unchastity to a woman
Yes351(3) — up to 7 years, or fine, or both
No351(2) — up to 2 years, or fine, or both
By an anonymous communication, or with precautions taken to conceal the name or abode of the person the threat comes from.
Yes351(4) as well — up to 2 years more
NoNothing is added
From section 351(2) to (4) as enacted. Sub-section (4) is punishable “in addition to the punishment provided for the offence under sub-section (1)”; sub-section (1) defines the offence, and (2) and (3) punish it.
Is BNS 351 bailable, cognizable and compoundable?
Arrest, bail and the court come from the central First Schedule to the BNSS; compounding comes from section 359. The classification is not uniform across India: notifications in force under the old Code are saved by BNSS section 531(2)(b), and the State positions verified so far are set out beneath the labels. Check your State before relying on them.
| Provision | Arrest | Bail | Compounding | Tried by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 351(2) | Non-cognizable | Bailable | Compoundable | Any Magistrate |
| 351(3) | Non-cognizable | Bailable | Compoundable | Magistrate of the first class |
| 351(4) | Non-cognizable | Bailable | Not compoundable | Magistrate of the first class |
What these labels mean
- ArrestNon-cognizable
For this offence alone, police cannot investigate or arrest without the required Magistrate’s order. They must still record the substance of the information and refer the informant to the Magistrate under BNSS section 174. If the same facts disclose a cognizable offence, the case is treated as cognizable under section 174(4).
- BailBailable
Bail is a right, not a request. The officer in charge or the court must release you on bail once you offer it — there is no discretion to refuse.
- CompoundingCompoundable
May be compounded by the person intimidated. A compromise has the effect of an acquittal (s. 359(8)), and is not allowed where a previous conviction makes the accused liable to enhanced punishment (s. 359(7)).
- CompoundingNot compoundable
The complainant cannot end the case by settling it. BNSS s. 359 lists every offence that may be compounded and this one is not on either list, so only the court can end the case.
- Tried byAny Magistrate
Triable by any Magistrate, which in practice means the Judicial Magistrate the case is allotted to locally.
- Tried byMagistrate of the first class
Tried by a Judicial Magistrate of the first class, whose sentencing power is capped, so the charge is expected to stay within that cap.
351(2) — Uttar Pradesh differs from the national position
| Label | National | Uttar Pradesh |
|---|---|---|
| Arrest | Non-cognizable | Cognizable |
| Bail | Bailable | Non-bailable |
In Uttar Pradesh, 351(2) is cognizable and non-bailable: the Allahabad High Court held the 31 July 1989 U.P. notification saved by BNSS s. 531(2)(b) (Vinay Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P., 3 October 2024). Read the judgment (paras 11, 14–16, 19).
351(2) — Goa differs from the national position
| Label | National | Goa |
|---|---|---|
| Bail | Bailable | Non-bailable |
In Goa, 351(2) is non-bailable: a 1973 notification makes every offence under IPC 506 non-bailable there, and the Supreme Court held it operative (Aires Rodrigues v. Vishwajeet P. Rane, 10 January 2017). BNSS s. 531(2)(b) saves such notifications, though no court has yet ruled on this one under the BNSS. Read the judgment.
351(3) — Goa differs from the national position
| Label | National | Goa |
|---|---|---|
| Bail | Bailable | Non-bailable |
In Goa, 351(3) is non-bailable: a 1973 notification makes every offence under IPC 506 non-bailable there, and the Supreme Court held it operative (Aires Rodrigues v. Vishwajeet P. Rane, 10 January 2017). BNSS s. 531(2)(b) saves such notifications, though no court has yet ruled on this one under the BNSS. Read the judgment.
Read from the First Schedule to the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (printed page 216), and section 359 for compounding. These are the national labels. A State notification saved by BNSS s. 531(2)(b), or a State amendment, can change them in that State; where one has been verified it is shown here.
The cards above give one compounding answer for the whole section. It holds for 351(2) and 351(3) only: BNSS s. 359 lists those two, and s. 359(9) allows nothing else — so an anonymous threat under 351(4) cannot be compounded.
| Sub-section | Maximum | Tried by | Compoundable | Summary trial | Time to complain |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 351(2) | Up to 2 years, or fine, or both | Any Magistrate | Yes — by the person intimidated | Yes | Ordinarily 3 years |
| 351(3) | Up to 7 years, or fine, or both | Magistrate of the first class | Yes — by the person intimidated | Yes | No s. 514 bar |
| 351(4) | Up to 2 years, in addition | Magistrate of the first class | No — on neither table | Not listed in s. 283(1) | Follows the intimidation charged with it: ordinarily 3 years with 351(2); no s. 514 bar with 351(3) |
First Schedule to the BNSS, printed page 216, as enacted by Parliament. Saved State notifications can alter the classification (BNSS s. 531(2)(b)): in Uttar Pradesh, 351(2) is cognizable and non-bailable (Vinay Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P., Allahabad High Court, 3 October 2024). Compounding s. 359(1); summary trial s. 283(1)(v).
Time to complain. 351(2), up to two years, falls in the three-year category (s. 514(2)(c)); 351(3), up to seven years, is outside every s. 514 category, so no limitation bar applies. 351(4) carries up to two years “in addition to the punishment provided for the offence under sub-section (1)” — the enacted words, although sub-section (1) defines criminal intimidation and it is (2) and (3) that punish it. It is charged with the intimidation it accompanies: an anonymous ordinary threat under 351(2) ordinarily falls in the three-year category, and one that accompanies aggravated intimidation under 351(3) meets no s. 514 bar, because offences tried together are measured by the more severe punishment (s. 514(3)). Every result remains subject to ss. 515–519 — when time starts, excluded periods, court closure, continuing offences, and extension where delay is explained or justice requires.
Punishment under BNS 351, against the offences around it
Imprisonment under section 351 may be of either description — rigorous or simple (BNS s. 4(c)). Under 351(2) and 351(3) a court may impose fine instead of imprisonment, or both; 351(4) mentions only the additional imprisonment. No sub-section sets a minimum. One mismatch is worth knowing: 351(3) carries up to seven years but is tried by a Magistrate of the first class, who may pass no more than three (BNSS s. 23(2)). A Magistrate who thinks a heavier sentence is deserved records that opinion and sends the case to the Chief Judicial Magistrate (s. 364). In a summary trial the ceiling is three months (s. 285(2)).
- BNS 351(3) — threat of death, grievous hurt and the restthis pageup to 7 years
- BNS 308(2) — extortionup to 7 years
- BNS 351(2) — criminal intimidationthis pageup to 2 years
- BNS 351(4) — anonymous threatthis pageup to 2 years more
- BNS 308(3) — putting in fear of injury to commit extortionup to 2 years
- BNS 352 — insult to provoke a breach of the peaceup to 2 years
- BNS 115(2) — voluntarily causing hurtup to 1 year, or fine
From the section text. The 351(4) bar is additional time on top of the punishment for criminal intimidation, not a stand-alone maximum. A maximum is a ceiling, not what a court awards.
What happens, and how long each part takes
- Information at the police stationthe day you report it
Under the central classification, the officer enters the substance in the station’s book and refers you to the Magistrate (BNSS s. 174(1)) — this is not an FIR. In Uttar Pradesh, where 351(2) is cognizable, an FIR is registered under s. 173 instead.
- Complaint to the Magistrateordinarily within 3 years for 351(2)
Oral or written. You and any witnesses present are examined on oath, and the accused must be given a chance to be heard before cognizance (ss. 223(1), 514(2)(c)).
Worried it is too late to file? Find the last day in the limitation calculator →
- From here it is not yours to control
Everything below happens on the investigating agency’s timetable and the court’s, not yours. You can follow it and you can be heard in it; you cannot set its pace.
Inquiry or investigation, if orderedas the Magistrate directsThe Magistrate may inquire, or order the police to investigate; the police still cannot arrest without a warrant (ss. 174(3), 225). The complaint is dismissed, with reasons, if there is no sufficient ground (s. 226).
- Summons to the accusedafter the witness list is filed
351(2) is a summons-case; 351(3) is a warrant-case, where a warrant or a summons may issue. A written complaint’s copy goes with it (ss. 2(1)(x), (z), 227).
- Trialno fixed period in the BNSS
351(2) and 351(3) may be tried summarily (s. 283(1)(v)). The case can end earlier by compounding, for those two sub-sections only (s. 359).
The time limits are the BNSS’s own, and the three-year period is subject to ss. 515–519. This timeline follows the central non-cognizable classification; in Uttar Pradesh a 351(2) case starts with an FIR. If the same facts also disclose a cognizable offence, the case is cognizable throughout and starts with an FIR instead (s. 174(4)).
Can the police register a case for a threat? What non-cognizable means here
In the central First Schedule to the BNSS, criminal intimidation is non-cognizable in every form, so section 174, not section 173, governs what happens at the police station. The officer must record the substance of what you say and refer you to the Magistrate. That is the law working as written, not a refusal.
That classification is not uniform across India. Notifications issued under the old Code, and in force when the BNSS began, are deemed issued under the BNSS (s. 531(2)(b)), so a State notification can change it. In Uttar Pradesh, a notification dated 31 July 1989, issued under section 10 of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1932, made IPC 506 cognizable and non-bailable in every district. In Vinay Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P. (Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 13827 of 2024, decided 3 October 2024), the Allahabad High Court held that notification saved, so 351(2) remains cognizable and non-bailable in Uttar Pradesh and the police there register an FIR under section 173. The notification covered IPC 506 as a whole, whose aggravated part is now 351(3), but the question the court decided was 351(2). Check for a notification in your own State before relying on the table below.
The position changes if the same facts disclose a cognizable offence. A threat used to make someone hand over money or property is extortion under BNS 308, and every extortion row in the First Schedule is cognizable (printed pages 207–208). Where one offence in a case is cognizable, the whole case is (s. 174(4)).
| Step | Allowed? | Where the Act says so |
|---|---|---|
| Record the substance of the information in the station’s book | Yes — they must | BNSS s. 174(1) |
| Refer the informant to the Magistrate | Yes — they must | s. 174(1)(i) |
| Send the Magistrate a fortnightly diary report of such cases | Yes — they must | s. 174(1)(ii) |
| Investigate on their own | No | s. 174(2) |
| Investigate once a Magistrate orders it | Yes, with a cognizable-case officer’s powers | s. 174(3) |
| Arrest without a warrant, even under such an order | No | ss. 35(2), 174(3) |
| Treat the case as cognizable if a cognizable offence is also disclosed | Yes | s. 174(4) |
The Magistrate can also be approached directly by complaint, without going to the police first (BNSS ss. 2(1)(h), 210(1)(a)).
If you have been threatened: making the complaint
A complaint is any allegation, oral or in writing, made to a Magistrate so that they act (BNSS s. 2(1)(h)). The Magistrate examines you and any witnesses present on oath and records it (s. 223(1)), and may inquire, or direct the police to investigate, before deciding whether to proceed (s. 225).
Time matters for the basic offence. The ordinary limitation period for 351(2) is three years, and the filing date is the one that counts (s. 514(2)(c) and Explanation); for an anonymous threat, time can run from the day the sender’s identity becomes known (s. 515(1)(c)). Section 514 sets no bar for 351(3), which carries seven years. An anonymous threat under 351(4) follows the intimidation it accompanies: ordinarily three years with 351(2), and no bar with 351(3), because offences tried together are measured by the more severe punishment (s. 514(3)). Every result remains subject to ss. 515–519: when time starts, excluded periods, court closure, continuing offences and the court’s power to extend.
Once summons issue, attend. In a case tried as a summons-case, which includes any summary trial, a complainant who does not appear may see the accused acquitted after thirty days’ time, unless an advocate appears or attendance is excused (ss. 279, 285(1)). Threats by phone or online are still section 351; the IT Act offences and online reporting are on the IT Act and cyber pages linked below.
If you have been accused: the procedure and your rights
Under the central First Schedule, criminal intimidation is non-cognizable, so no one may be arrested for it except under a Magistrate’s warrant or order (BNSS s. 35(2)), and bailable: a person arrested or brought before a court who offers bail must be released, and a person unable to give a bail bond within a week may be presumed indigent and discharged on a bond without surety (s. 478(1)). In Uttar Pradesh, 351(2) is cognizable and non-bailable under the saved 1989 State notification, so arrest without warrant is possible on the conditions of s. 35(1), and bail is under s. 480 rather than a right.
On a complaint, the Magistrate may not take cognizance without giving the accused an opportunity of being heard (s. 223(1), first proviso). A summons comes with a copy of a written complaint (s. 227(3)), and the Magistrate may allow appearance through an advocate (s. 228).
A case under 351(2) or 351(3) may be tried summarily, where no sentence above three months can be passed (ss. 283(1)(v), 285(2)). Free legal aid is set out at the end of this page.
More questions about this page
What is IPC 506 in BNS?▼
Is BNS 351 cognizable or non-cognizable, and can police file an FIR?▼
What is the punishment for threatening to kill someone under BNS?▼
Can a criminal intimidation case be settled by compromise?▼
What is IPC 507 in BNS, and what is the punishment for an anonymous threat?▼
Does BNS 351 cover threats made on WhatsApp, by phone or online?▼
Official sources checked
The statutes, rules and regulator pages the statements on this page were checked against.
- Read 13 September 2026. Section 351(1) to (4) quoted and summarised from the enacted text.
- Printed page 216: all three 351 rows non-cognizable and bailable; 351(2) any Magistrate, 351(3) and 351(4) Magistrate of the first class. Printed pages 207–208: every extortion row cognizable.
- Non-cognizable information, complaints and cognizance, summons, summary trial, compounding, bail, limitation, and the saving of notifications issued under the old Code.
- Paras 11 and 19: the U.P. notification dated 31 July 1989 under s. 10 of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1932, making IPC 506 cognizable and non-bailable, is saved by BNSS s. 531(2), so 351(2) remains cognizable and non-bailable in Uttar Pradesh. Read 14 September 2026.
- IPC 503 → BNS 351(1); IPC 506 → 351(2), 351(3); IPC 507 → 351(4). Not marked as changed.
What to do next
A criminal matter is not something to work out from a page, and this one does not pretend otherwise. Whether you are complaining or answering a charge, the next step is a lawyer.
Free legal services are a legal entitlement, not charity. Under section 12 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 they are available to anyone in custody, every woman and every child, members of a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe, persons with disabilities, victims of trafficking or of a disaster or caste atrocity, industrial workers, and anyone whose income is below the limit their State sets — provided the legal services authority is satisfied there is a case to bring or defend (section 13).
- NALSA — National Legal Services Authority
- NALSA legal aid helpline (toll-free): 15100
- Your District Legal Services Authority. Every district has one, at the district court, and it is the office that arranges a lawyer.
Not legal advice. This page explains what a provision says and how the procedure around it works, checked against the Act as in force on the date shown. It is not advice about a charge, a complaint or an arrest, and it cannot be: whether a provision fits a set of facts is the question a court decides, and the facts a page cannot see are usually the ones that matter. If you are facing a criminal matter, or deciding whether to start one, speak to an advocate.
Last reviewed September 2026.